Shigeki SHIBATA
U.S. foreign assistance to Japan (MSA) and the Japanese aircraft industry
after the Korean War (1950-53)
The purpose of this article is to examine the relations between the
Mutual Security Act (MSA) assistance to Japan and the revival of the
Japanese aircraft industry. Japan received various forms of assistance
from the U.S. and other countries or organizations after World War II.
The MSA is noteworthy for establishing a link between Japanese rearmament
and the U.S. agricultural disposal program. Section 550, which required
MSA aid recipients to take U.S. agricultural surpluses, was added to
the MSA in 1953. As a result, Japan was required to sell surplus U.S.
agricultural products on the domestic market and use the proceeds to
finance its defense industry. The funds were mainly invested in equipment
and technology for the aircraft industry.
This type of aid was called 'defense support' economic assistance, being
a form of assistance to countries that had military agreements with
the U.S. but were unable to meet their military obligations. Since funds
were created by selling U.S. agricultural surpluses in Japan, the MSA
was beneficial to both U.S. agricultural exports and to the Japanese
aircraft industry.
<Special lecture>
Eric L. JONES
Environment, state and economic development in the history of Europe
and Asia
This paper considers why Europe
was the first continent to achieve sustained economic growth. Society's
responses were more important than environmental endowments. Culture
was not fixed but responsive to exogenous economic change, though capable
of reinforcing it. Technological change was less fundamental than the
emergence of societies that did not discourage it. Objections that,
without technological advance, market growth would have remained 'Smithian'
(allocative) are countered by noting that such growth still had ample
scope in the eighteenth century. As to politics, the bonding of Europe's
political units in a stable way, offering competition and a single market,
was highly important. Nevertheless, two modern groups converge on the
view that Europe's growth came late and did not depend on internal European
circumstances. The 'world historians' see the advance as accidental.
The 'quantifiers' see change before 1820 as insignificant. The present
paper urges that early Europe's institutions were vital for generating
and sustaining growth. Europe's political and legal institutions, although
originally intended to promote elite interests, were particularly 'open'
and generalisable to other social groups as well as, eventually, to
non-Europeans.
<Conference report>
Hisashi WATANABE and Takafumi KUROSAWA
Types of regional integration in historical perspectivepecial
The 68th annual meeting of
the Socio-Economic History Society took place on May 29th and 30th 1999,
at Kyoto University. WATANABE Hisashi organized the symposium, with
YAMAMOTO Yuzo and SUGIHARA Kaoru as moderators. Four reports on modern
and recent European history were presented, to which HASHIMOTO Juro
and HAMASHITA Takeshi provided comments from the viewpoint of Asian
historical studies.
Watanabe's report discussed the characteristics and types of region
defined as 'historical space with individuality', and analyzed various
forms and aspects of integration by those regions. The following four
reports were presented in response to the questions he raised: 'Origins
of the integrated Europe: the dual system in the Habsburg monarchy'
by SATO Masanori, 'The post-war reconstruction of Belgium and the integration
of the European economy' by KOJIMA Takeshi, 'Economic regional integration
and the process of system integration in Switzerland' by KUROSAWA Takafumi,
'Business activities of German electrical enterprises in Europe and
regional integration during the inter war period' by IMAKUBO Sachio.
The discussion mostly centered on the following three points: (1) regional
integration in general and the positioning of nation and region, (2)
issues regarding the interpretation of individual cases, and (3) comparisons
with Asian history.